Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Beverage\s+Layout\s+Problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Beverage\s+Layout\s+Problem\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1): Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 21:11:42 -0500; Hi Mike, I can't imagine that a few 100 feet of extra length would make any discernable difference in signal loss - especially on low bands. There are 1000 ft feed lines (RG-6) on some of my Beverage; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00273.html (10,171 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1): Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 21:57:00 -0500; In the interest of sharing - poor signal strength issues with Beverages are most likely attributable to the balun and/or feed system rather than feed line losses. Low SWR is not an indication of high; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00274.html (12,947 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 08:18:16 -0500; Google autotransformer and see something like: /Auto Transformer/is a kind of electrical transformer, where primary and secondary shares same common single winding. That is, the windings are N O T is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00277.html (8,820 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1): Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 10:54:50 -0500; Hi Jim, Do you have any experience or knowledge you can share about how well the shielding performs or compares at HF for double & triple shielded RG-6 & RG-11 cables? These (Commscope brand) ) have; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00313.html (9,004 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]