Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Difference\s+in\s+TailTwister\s+and\s+Ham\s+4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Difference\s+in\s+TailTwister\s+and\s+Ham\s+4\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: Difference in TailTwister and Ham 4 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Thomson" <jim.thom@telus.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:07:03 -0700; starting/running torque between the Ham 4 and TailTwister? Twister. Wrong. On page 154 in my UP THE TOWER book, the comparison table of rotators has the Ham IV with 800 inch/pounds of rotating torque; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00268.html (8,714 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Difference in TailTwister and Ham 4 (score: 1): Author: Ray Benny <rayn6vr@cableone.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 18:40:55 -0700; Jim, Good analysis. That comes out to 67 ft/lbs for the H4 and 83 ft/lbs for the TT. I can understand that if there is a good wind on a long boom, multi-element antenna, both would struggle to get st; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00269.html (9,798 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Difference in TailTwister and Ham 4 (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 23:33:37 -0400; They are a real struggle. You have to be quick on brake release and applying power. When you release the brake the power has to be there. Too quick and it binds, too slow and you don't have the power; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00278.html (13,045 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]