Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Tune\s+160\/80\s+Vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+FW\:\s+Tune\s+160\/80\s+Vertical\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] FW: Tune 160/80 Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Paul Sturpe" <sturpe@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:59:52 -0500; I'm helping a friend who has an 80 meter 1/4 wave vertical. At the top, he has a 160 meter trap then a wire extending horizontally for 160 meters. It is therefore an inverted L on 160. The SWR on 80; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00309.html (7,968 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Tune 160/80 Vertical (score: 1): Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@frontier.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 11:40:49 -0800; HI Dick That SWR run actually looks pretty good. I have exactly the same setup here and my SWR is a little lower than yours--1.5:1 at resonance. You have to remember that the impedance of that 160 me; /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00310.html (8,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]