Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Feeding\s+a\s+multi\s+band\s+loop\s+$cloud\s+burner$\s+with\s+balanced\s+line\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Feeding\s+a\s+multi\s+band\s+loop\s+$cloud\s+burner$\s+with\s+balanced\s+line\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Feeding a multi band loop (cloud burner) with balanced line (score: 1): Author: wb1dog@hotmail.com (James Apple); Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 17:00:51 PDT; I just upgraded my 80 meter full wave horizontal loop to use balanced line (450 ohm) for the first 50 feet then coax (bury-flex) for the last 20. At the transition I'm using a w2du 1:1 balun. I expec; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00299.html (8,535 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Feeding a multi band loop (cloud burner) with balanced line (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Tue, 18 May 1999 10:32:10 -0400; A 4:1 balun is probably not the answer Jim, unless you add so much loss the SWR is reduced. Unlike 1:1 choke baluns, 4:1 baluns provide reduced performance when operated at high VSWR. You have added; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00302.html (9,171 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]