Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force12\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Force12\s*$/: 62 ]

Total 62 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Lee Wical <leewical@lava.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 09:03:44 -1000; Bottom line! Why buy Force 12? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00706.html (8,296 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth D. Grimm, K4XL" <grimm@sbc.edu>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:32:28 -0400; Sometimes they have just what you need. For example, I needed a good portable antenna to take to the beach for IOTA operation. The Force 12 Sigma 5, a five band vertical dipole, fit the bill exactly.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00707.html (9,018 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Leigh L. Klotz, Jr." <Leigh@WA5ZNU.org>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 12:17:57 -0700; It might be that the time has come and gone for $2000 antennas made out of piles of aluminum tubing. With the increasing availability of accurate modelling software, the barriers to entry into this m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00709.html (9,084 bytes)
44. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "K8RI" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:28:05 -0400; I don't have any of the big antennas up (or what I consider big), nor have I ever dealt with any of the current "big antenna" companies so I can only speak from a comparative and good business appro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00710.html (10,782 bytes)
45. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Bert Almemo" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:57:50 -0400; Hi Ken et all, Unfortunately, it's thinking like yours that let manufacturers and dealers get away with bad, rude or non-existing customer service. If we all demanded better service we would get bett; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00711.html (10,598 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Mike, K6BR" <noddy1211@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:12:22 -0700; Your 100% correct Bert. Steppir who actually do have an advanced state of the art antenna have all their nice color manuals on their website as stated before. Plus their customer service in my opinio; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00712.html (11,083 bytes)
47. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:35:01 -0400; The question IMHO is not some much what F-12s customer service HAS been, but what it WILL be in the future. Hopefully the new ownership can improve customer service. A little good publicity then... -; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00713.html (8,744 bytes)
48. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Pat Poirier" <hkman@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 19:48:15 -0400; When did Force 12 get new ownership? Past history is very important how many times can you get kick before you take notice. You need to learn from past history or it will repeat it self. I for one do; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00714.html (9,652 bytes)
49. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 20:16:44 -0400; There was mention on the TT list that they are currently undergoing a change in ownership -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! To iterate is human, to recurse, divine. _____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00715.html (8,592 bytes)
50. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Rick Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 17:24:30 -0700 (PDT); N6BT, in an email several weeks ago, denied that there was any change in ownership, for whatever that is worth. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _____________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00716.html (9,148 bytes)
51. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Donald Chester <k4kyv@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:25:30 +0000; I would always encourage hams to share technical information on their equipment, whether home built or commercial. When you buy a product you are not obligated in any way to keep its design confiden; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00718.html (9,460 bytes)
52. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:26:27 -0700; This is plainly not always true. One might buy something under a license agreement or with some contractual arrangement that prevents it. Software is, of course, the most notorious case of this. As s; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00725.html (12,647 bytes)
53. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "K8RI" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:05:57 -0400; BTW In another time and life I've been a Sys Admin, Developmental Analyst (fancy name for programmer), and project manager. I'm also a published author and photographer so I do have a passing acquain; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00728.html (10,157 bytes)
54. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Charles Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 03:30:26 -0400; Then I stand corrected -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! I may not agree with a word you say, but I shall defend unto my death your right to say it. -- Voltaire _________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00729.html (8,946 bytes)
55. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Bert" <balmemo@sympatico.ca>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:54:28 -0400; Hi Jim and all, You can copy anything you like if it's for personal use, not to be sold. It doesn't matter if there is a patent, industrial design or any other kind of legal issues protecting the wid; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00732.html (13,631 bytes)
56. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 07:49:39 -0700; You're right (although I suspect some content providers would differ with you). I'm not sure that actually falls in the fair use category, but, rather, in some other exemption. And, I'm not sure that; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00735.html (12,225 bytes)
57. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Chuck Lewis" <clewis@knology.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:11:14 -0500; Another related implementation was the extendable antenna on the Canadian "Alouette" Satellite in 1962: http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/education/innovations/sti-inno-stem_e.html This antenna used a S.T.E.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00746.html (10,458 bytes)
58. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: VR2BrettGraham <vr2bg@harts.org.hk>; Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:27:53 +0000; Most Force-12 products are largely just certain lengths of tubing & this is probably why they deal with their manuals as they do. There are now I think knock-off copies of Force-12 products available; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00763.html (8,643 bytes)
59. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 07:51:29 EDT; pictures are really pitiful - they look like copies of copies of copies. Hopefully the new owner(s) will use these comments constructively. The manuals are the second most complained thing about F12; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00786.html (8,499 bytes)
60. Re: [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1): Author: "Mark Kempisty" <mkempisty@verizon.net>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:38:10 -0400; I bought a new in box C3SS that was about 4 or 5 years old. Looked at the bundled elements (each labeled as to what element it is) glanced at the manual and put the antenna together with minimal refe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00791.html (8,851 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4]