Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+BEST\s+MEDIUM\s+SIZED\s+TRIBANDER\s+BEAM\s+FOR\s+CONTESTING\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Mark" <m2eng@mts.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 11:12:02 -0600
Thanks guys for your replys! I am currently using a TH3MK4. (XM240 & Sigma 180) My choices are: 1. F-12 C19-XR 2. Tennadyne Log 3. StepIR 3 or 4 element. What do you think? Winnipeg has cold winters
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00744.html (8,075 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Walker" <jim@walkersdomain.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:28:41 -0600
Mark, You might think about creating a "Customer Support" category with minimal weighting. Even with minimal weighting, my guess is that it will re-arrange your order if you do. KB0X --Original Messa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00745.html (9,580 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:35:25 -0600
Since your budget seems to be unlimited, why not go for the SteppIR 4 element? It is not the best for contesting for probably for everything else. 73 Keith NM5G Thanks guys for your replys! I am curr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00746.html (8,941 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 14:11:57 -0700
Curious what you think is a better contest single antenna and why? We are talking single Medium sized antennas. --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00747.html (9,912 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 19:27:54 -0700
So we have 2 beams that are on 18 and 20 ft. booms. The C3/C4 has two count em two active elements on each band 20-10m. The SteppIR has 3 active elements. Yes, the C4 has the 40m dipole. Yes you get
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00748.html (15,983 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kdutson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 20:47:10 -0600
Band changes too slow on the SteppIR when checking another band for opening while trying to hold current run freq. Plus, if you have a modern rig with two receivers you can hear both bands at the sam
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00749.html (10,869 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Miller" <JimMiller@STL-OnLine.Net>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:42:05 -0600
Tribanders - pooh. Butternuts RULE. Hears equally in all directions. Low angle of radiation. Instantaneous band changes. No rotor problems. No tower problems. No guyline worries. MUCH less costly. Ea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00750.html (18,968 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: BEST MEDIUM SIZED TRIBANDER BEAM FOR CONTESTING? (score: 1)
Author: "w0mu" <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 21:18:16 -0700
I was not saying you or anyone else was critical of SteppIR. In fact, I agree with you. Mike W0MU Hi Mike, Let me be perfectly clear on this. I AM NOT CRITICAL OF THE STEPPIR! Forget whatever other e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00752.html (19,678 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu