Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Fw\:\s+Why\s+radials\s+improve\s+radiation\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: "Al Williams" <alwilliams@olywa.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 09:45:20 -0700
_______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00382.html (11,089 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: "pehaire" <pehaire@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 15:10:21 -0500
What about an end fed Zepp? Fed with open wire. I have read that it thinks there is an immaginary 1/4 wave section where the feeder is terminate at a dead or insulator point. I know this is a high im
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00387.html (13,222 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2011 18:04:48 -0400
You may not strictly need radials, but the point of maximum current is still only 1/4 wavelength above ground. This means that: 1) the ground loss due to not having radials is not as ridiculously hig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00392.html (8,380 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: Why radials improve radiation! (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 08:07:29 -0700
An interesting question. The current distribution along the antenna is the same, regardless of the position of the feedpoint. It's determined by the coupling of one part of the antenna to another (an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-05/msg00406.html (10,122 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu