Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Fw\:\s+elevated\s+radials\s+vertical\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+Fw\:\s+elevated\s+radials\s+vertical\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "EC1CT Fernando" <ec1cwg@dxhunters.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 10:44:19 +0200; SORRY. MADE A FEW MISTAKES ON THE FIRST MESSAGE. NOW, THIS ONE IS CORRECT. 73S Talking about these things. Yesterday, I was setting up my new top-loaded quarter wave vertical for 80 meters (see me at; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00178.html (8,807 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "EC1CT Fernando" <ec1cwg@dxhunters.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 11:33:54 +0200; Hello Jim, Thank you very much for the input. Well, I made a few mistakes on my previous message. I should have said that the SWR was 1.7 (3.790) up in the roof and the resistance was nearly 20 ohmns; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00179.html (9,055 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 07:04:43 -0400; <<<SORRY. MADE A FEW MISTAKES ON THE FIRST MESSAGE. NOW, THIS ONE IS CORRECT. 73S Talking about these things. Yesterday, I was setting up my new top-loaded quarter wave vertical for 80 meters (see me; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00181.html (7,936 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Fw: Fw: elevated radials vertical (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 13:51:32 -0400; You can raise the impedance of your vertical to 50 ohms by installing a hair pin coil at the base which may make you and your transmitter happier. It won't effect the antenna performance. I agree wit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00197.html (8,655 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]