Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+LP\/PQ\s+Message\s+regarding\s+lighting\s+damage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fw\:\s+LP\/PQ\s+Message\s+regarding\s+lighting\s+damage\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fw: LP/PQ Message regarding lighting damage (score: 1): Author: George Kauffman <nextek_lightning_expert@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:26:56 -0700 (PDT); Hello Les; We make an exceptionally good F protector, which does limit the voltage on the center conductor of a 75 Ohm video line. http://www.nexteklightning.com/products/Arrestors/Standard/Cab; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00435.html (7,372 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: LP/PQ Message regarding lighting damage (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 08:08:58 -0700; Is it UL listed? The data sheet doesn't show any NRTL listings or approvals. _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00444.html (7,701 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fw: LP/PQ Message regarding lighting damage (score: 1): Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:47:57 -0700; A UL Listing MIGHT be needed to satisfy building codes (if those codes require a protector), but it probably does not mean they have verified that the product does anything useful. BTW -- I don't see; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00448.html (8,437 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]