Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Insulated\s+elements\,\s+Yes\s+\-\s+No\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Fwd\:\s+Insulated\s+elements\,\s+Yes\s+\-\s+No\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Insulated elements, Yes - No? (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 18:12:01 -0400 (EDT); So, if i understand it right: The elements should be galvanically connected to the bom to avoid static discharge (make sense), to enhance tuning the tower for 80/160 use (make sense). A small wire or; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00137.html (13,267 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: Insulated elements, Yes - No? (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 12:43:51 -0400 (EDT); Well, the driven element will not need any correction as that stays insulated, unless you want to change from direct connect to gamma match). I just wondered if anyone had the experience with what co; /archives//html/Towertalk/2014-08/msg00152.html (10,149 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]