Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Safety\s+line\s+on\s+tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Safety\s+line\s+on\s+tower\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Safety line on tower (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 23:45:18 -0400; Don't understand your statement. I don't see why it should be so hard to add one more wire running from the top to the (near) bottom of any tower (that is climbable that is). I'm strongly consider it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00257.html (9,166 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Safety line on tower (score: 1): Author: Bob K6UJ <k6uj@pacbell.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 21:09:43 -0700; Hans, Like you, I am also considering it for my tower. I like the idea of a safety line. I am not concerned that some might think it is not appropriate for a ham tower. Would we be too safe by using; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00258.html (10,241 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]