Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Shielded\s+shack\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+Shielded\s+shack\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 13:27:51 -0400 (EDT); The idea is not to let any current through the aluminum foil. ALL connections to the foil is in ONE point, the point there everything is entering the shack. I do not believe tht the foil would protec; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00307.html (13,153 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 11:33:26 -0700; On 9/28/13 10:27 AM, Hans Hammarquist wrote: The idea is not to let any current through the aluminum foil. ALL connections to the foil is in ONE point, the point there everything is entering the shac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00308.html (11,677 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 14:56:44 -0400; On 9/28/2013 1:27 PM, Hans Hammarquist wrote: The idea is not to let any current through the aluminum foil. ALL connections to the foil is in ONE point, the point there everything is entering the sha; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00310.html (17,036 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:32:37 -0700; On 9/28/13 11:56 AM, Roger (K8RI) on TT wrote: On 9/28/2013 1:27 PM, Hans Hammarquist wrote: The idea is not to let any current through the aluminum foil. ALL connections to the foil is in ONE point,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00316.html (10,184 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 16:50:14 -0400 (EDT); Hi Partick, I am not intending to protect my shack from a direct lightning strike. A direct hit would possibly evaporate whatever is there. When my first house burnt down after a direct hit there wer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00333.html (8,653 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 00:45:35 -0400 (EDT); If it wasn't for the requirement that my shack has to be less than 100 square feet a shipping container would be excellent. I believe many towns have similar zoning laws: You may, without building pe; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00000.html (8,268 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:29:44 -0700; I believe many towns have similar zoning laws: You may, without building permit build a structure that is less than 100 sqf. There are steel shipping/storage containers (aka ConEx) in the 8x8 foot an; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00001.html (7,353 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: Jim Smith <jimsmith@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 01:44:27 -0700; Stand it on its end and run M/2 with 1 position on the main floor and the other on the 2nd? Sorry, still spinny after big WW RTTY effort. 73, Jim VE7FO I believe many towns have similar zoning laws:; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00030.html (9,872 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Shielded shack (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 05:12:25 -0400; Sorry, still spinny after big WW RTTY effort. So a larger out building requires a permit. The only problem I see in the permit requirements. I could use a shipping container, but would probably need; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00031.html (8,935 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]