Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+hardline\s+bending\s+radius\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Fwd\:\s+hardline\s+bending\s+radius\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Fwd: hardline bending radius (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:24:41 -0500 (EST); Does anyone have a good idea of minimum bending radius for the 1/2 inch cable TV hardline? I have been told anything from 5" to 50". I believe 5" is way too sharp but 50"??? I sure that 50" would not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00191.html (7,941 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Fwd: hardline bending radius (score: 1): Author: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 12:07:23 -0500 (EST); I understand that the bending radius is a lot less if the cable is braided or corrugated. Well, the cable I have is neither. The shield is an aluminum "tube" with no corrugation or anything else to a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00242.html (10,555 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: hardline bending radius (score: 1): Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 17:06:55 -0800; Well, the cable I have is neither. The shield is an aluminum "tube" with no corrugation or anything else to aid the bending. The center conductor is a solid copper plated aluminum wire. (No, I am not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00247.html (9,523 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: hardline bending radius (score: 1): Author: Stan Stockton <wa5rtg@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 19:29:01 -0600; Perhaps you could just cut a short piece and experiment with it, if it is that important to bend it in the tightest radius possible. Stan, K5GO Sent from my iPad _____________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00248.html (12,534 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]