Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+G5RV\s+balun\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+G5RV\s+balun\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] G5RV balun question (score: 1): Author: "John G." <af5cc@fidmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 14:39:51 -0800; I have a homebrew G5RV type antenna. The antenna wire is fed with 300 ohm radio shack twin lead, which runs to a Van Gorden HI-Q 4:1 balun, which then feeds RG-11 75ohm coax. I have used this system; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00158.html (7,365 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV balun question (score: 1): Author: Joseph or Ruth Patrick <hdmc38@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 19:24:45 -0700 (PDT); Good Evening John 狢 would ask you after using your antenna system for 14 years with good results why are you considering adding a coax choke? Are you having a problem with RF in the shack? Are you h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00164.html (8,843 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV balun question (score: 1): Author: "John G." <af5cc@fidmail.com>; Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 21:39:24 -0800; Hi Joe, Thanks for the email. I figured I was just looking at a way to improve it. If it does reduce noise some, then it was worth it. 73 John AF5CC -- Original Message -- From: Joseph or Ruth Patric; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00165.html (9,399 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV balun question (score: 1): Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 23:38:59 -0700; No, that would be of zero benefit. What COULD help is winding multiple turns of the coax through #31 ferrite cores, or building one of the bifilar chokes described in my RFI tutorial. See the Choke C; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-05/msg00166.html (8,364 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]