Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+GAP\s+Voyager\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+GAP\s+Voyager\s+question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager question (score: 1): Author: KI9A@aol.com; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 17:55:37 EDT; Gentleman, ( and Ladies), I have a GAP Voyager 20-160 vertical up, had it about 2 years now. It really outperforms my 135' open wire fed dipole @ 40', past 1500 miles, ( 80, 40 meters) and I enjoy it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00058.html (7,155 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager question (score: 1): Author: "Steve Katz" <stevek@jmr.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:55:53 -0700; All the GAPs are really center-fed, and the "radials" at the base are really just end loading the bottom radiator section; there's separate top loading for the upper radiator section. Try adding more; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00059.html (9,039 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] GAP Voyager question (score: 1): Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:34:12 -0400; I have the Challenger Model...just 3 radials, actually trimmed one or two slightly shorter, and it works quite well on 40 meters as a center fed 1/4 wave vertical dipole. It is mounted over the salt; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00064.html (10,472 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]