Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+GRC\s+vs\.\s+IMC\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Fox - N6MEF" <n6mef@mefox.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 20:18:47 -0800
I'm curious what people use for mounting pipes (not masts) on larger towers and why. For example, when mounting a dish antenna, a vertical pipe is typically installed. What I mostly see is galvanized
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00407.html (7,334 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:54:05 -0500
towers and why. For example, when mounting a dish antenna, a vertical pipe is typically installed. The reason you can use pipe (as opposed to tubing) on commercial towers is that there is no bending
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00413.html (7,954 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Fox - N6MEF" <n6mef@mefox.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 08:39:52 -0800
Thanks, but my question was not about tubing or masts. My question was about GRC vs. IMC for mounting pipes. Does anyone have any information why one vs. the other should be used? Thanks, Michael N6M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00417.html (8,362 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:07:16 -0500
about GRC vs. IMC for mounting pipes. Please elucidate what GRC and IMC are. I was unable to google either of them and get the answer. Cheers, Steve K7LXC ___________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00434.html (7,836 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 19:24:04 -0500
Thanks, but my question was not about tubing or masts. My question was about GRC vs. IMC for mounting pipes. Please elucidate what GRC and IMC are. I was unable to google either of them and get the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00436.html (8,722 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: Robie Elms <ruler55@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:30:09 -0600
IMC - intermediate metal conduit RGC- rigid galvanized conduit Robie - AJ4F _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00437.html (8,960 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: "jcjacobsen@q.com" <jcjacobsen@q.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:04:45 -0500 (EST)
The question on the table is: <snip> Please elucidate what GRC and IMC are. I was unable to google either of them and get the answer. <> Google again and put tubing after GRC or IMC K9WN Jake _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00440.html (7,772 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Fox - N6MEF" <n6mef@mefox.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:25:45 -0800
about GRC vs. IMC for mounting pipes. Please elucidate what GRC and IMC are. I was unable to google either of them and get the answer. See my original question. Michael N6MEF _______________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00443.html (7,717 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 15:21:41 +0000
http://www.lmgtfy.com/?q=grc+vs+imc about GRC vs. IMC for mounting pipes. Please elucidate what GRC and IMC are. I was unable to google either of them and get the answer. See my original question. Mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00449.html (8,997 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] GRC vs. IMC (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Fox - N6MEF" <n6mef@mefox.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 07:26:38 -0800
Yes, but that was not my question. Again, see the original question. Michael N6MEF _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing li
/archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00450.html (8,000 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu