Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Gap\s+Vertical\,\s+Verticals\s+in\s+general\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: force12@interserv.com (force12@interserv.com)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 08:55:14 -0700 (PDT)
Good morning. I have always been fascinated by various verticals appearing to "work" better when they are elevated. If it is really an HF vertical-vertical, then the highest one would want the feedpo
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00094.html (10,002 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: ku7y@sage.dri.edu (Monte Stark)
Date: Mon, 4 Aug 1997 09:37:16 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Tom and all, One quick observation..... I have a 24' pipe, 1 1/2", mounted on a 4x4 post with about 40 radials. Each radial is about 40'. I also have a DX77 mounted on the top of a tower at 37'. O
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00096.html (9,257 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: w4zw@juno.com (Jon E Hamlet)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 09:19:17 -0400
Tom, I've not modeled verticals but have fooled with them for over 40 years in all kinds of configurations, from simple ground mounted verticals against a radial field to phased arrays. My favorite a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00160.html (9,896 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 19:57:40 -0700
Tom, None of the responses to your thread described the vertical antenna characteristics in quite the same way as I have come to understand them, so I thought I'd throw mine in after the dust settled
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00246.html (9,031 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: n4kg@juno.com (T. A. Russell)
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 07:52:39 -0600
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997 19:57:40 -0700 ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady) writes: The number of radials ZERO radials? Really?! Now THAT must present in interesting match to a low impedance feedline!
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00253.html (9,191 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: "k4sb@worldnet.att.net"@worldnet.att.net (Edward W. Sleight)
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 1997 21:29:11 -0700
Must agree with Tom's comments. Many years ago, DXers followed the notion that "higher is better" and included verticals in that thinking. directions". I believe the next significant improvement in v
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00260.html (8,211 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: ftbrady@cosmoslink.net (Frank T. Brady)
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 12:46:51 -0700
Yeah, I know. I should have said "approaches 1" ... I was reading a graph which seemed to have a downward slope and was barely above the zero line at a base height of 1.0 wavelengths. The graph didn
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00272.html (8,252 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: CQK8DO@aol.com (CQK8DO@aol.com)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 08:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
I have not seen the aforementioned article... But, the broadcast industry did extensive experiments in the early days, as did Sevick, and a number of others in more recent years, including Al's excel
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00336.html (8,714 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: seay@Alaska.NET (Jan & Del Seay)
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 1997 10:56:54 -0800 (AKDT)
To: <towertalk@contesting.com> -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: own
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00341.html (10,496 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Gap Vertical, Verticals in general (score: 1)
Author: cebik@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (L. B. Cebik)
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 10:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
Although both books are cionsidered classics in ham circles, both contain dated material that has been superceded. Indeed, both should be classified as "vertical with ground plane" books, where gp i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1997-08/msg00391.html (11,274 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu