Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ground\s+level\s+and\s+sea\s+level\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:03:51 -0400
OK, I just have to ask. Why do Hams use height above sea level since it is almost meaningless for anything we are dealing with? I see it for getting out at HF, VHF, and even wind survival discussions
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00173.html (7,771 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 12:15:33 EDT
Apparently they think there is some sort of advantage to being 5000 or 8000 feet above sea level for HF. I do just fine at 20 feet above sea level. In fact I wish I was at sea level...surrounded by s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00174.html (7,336 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: Steve Katz <stevek@jmr.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 09:20:48 -0700
Because at higher elevations, the air is thinner, there's less oxygen and the brain starts to starve. I always discuss my elevation "above seal level," which uses the standard Pacific Seal as a refer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00176.html (8,065 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:22:40 -0400
I think it is relevant to those of us who live in very flat areas such as most of Florida where storm surge is relevant. Otherwise, it may be relevant as a common point of reference re. topography, e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00177.html (9,132 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 12:25:10 -0400
One of the best locations I ever worked from was along the edge of a bay in northeastern Mass ... amazing how that junk wire antenna fed through junk catv cable from a Heath SB-101 got out! Proximity
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00178.html (8,518 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: "David Robbins K1TTT" <k1ttt@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 17:01:06 -0000
There can be some effects at high altitudes for vhf/uhf stuff. there can be tropo ducts that are only experienced above a certain altitude. It is also used in figuring line of sight paths for microwa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00180.html (9,784 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 13:02:55 -0400
flat relevant. OK for storm surge. It has meaning. Unless you're worried about tidal surges, anything else really should be height above surrounding terrrain. reference property high to ravine where
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00181.html (9,464 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 10:11:06 -0700
Because it's what you read off a map? Indeed.. HAAT would be a more reasonable thing for many discussions. Of course, relatively few people give their antenna heights in ft MSL. (unless you're talkin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00182.html (8,496 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:05:25 -0700
Yeah, I am at 1700ft ASL which sounds impressive until you realize the the mountain next to me is around 4000ft ASL :) If you ever want experience first hand the contrast between a good DX QTH and a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00184.html (9,660 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2005 11:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Back in the 80s when I was in broadcasting, the FCC always looked at height above sea level...even in Kansas. The FAA seems to be very interested in ASL also. (Something about NOT fly planes into mou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00188.html (9,485 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2005 15:44:56 -0400
Perhaps they don't know how to adjust their altimeters. Me, I'm at 62 feet, highest point in county is 75 feet and I am surrounded by salt water, its just not close enough to get the advantage being
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00194.html (8,286 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground level and sea level (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2005 11:09:55 -0700
How close do you have to be to get the advantage of being at the "edge"? De k1hi Perhaps they don't know how to adjust their altimeters. Me, I'm at 62 feet, highest point in county is 75 feet and I a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00261.html (9,175 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu