- 21. [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:21:54 +0000 (UTC)
- I don't know of any of those used for a tower guy anchor and I'm not an engineer but my advice is RUN away from these anchors. Easy to install - and in this case - easy to fail. Rohn specs c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00107.html (9,043 bytes)
- 22. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 09:55:39 -0700
- On 4/14/20 9:12 AM, Grant Saviers wrote: I have to wonder if a permitting authority would allow these for permanent structures without a soils test and engineering, and costs. (Utilities run on diffe
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00108.html (13,558 bytes)
- 23. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: Tom WA9WSJ via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 17:06:09 +0000 (UTC)
- All great advice. This is how I dealt with guy wire anchors, 20 years ago! Concrete blocks... http://www.wa9wsj.com/antenna_page.htm Scroll down about 1/4 of the page and you'll find it. GL and stay
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00109.html (8,898 bytes)
- 24. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: <n6sj@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 10:12:45 -0700
- Tim, That is EXACTLY the right answer! Having managed the installation of many guyed towers for microwave communications sites, I know you dont start any construction without the stamped and signed P
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00110.html (13,461 bytes)
- 25. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: K9MA <k9ma@sdellington.us>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:57:05 -0500
- Another advantage of concrete anchors is that it's quite easy to calculate their strength. Assuming the anchor rod isn't the limiting factor, just add up the weight of the concrete and the dirt on to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00111.html (12,048 bytes)
- 26. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 11:53:44 -0700
- The discussion of "Class 1", etc soils reminds me of trying measure ground conductivity values for NEC simulation. Real grounds are just way too complicated and inconsistent vs location and dependent
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00112.html (9,474 bytes)
- 27. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 12:14:03 -0700
- On 4/14/20 11:53 AM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist wrote: The discussion of "Class 1", etc soils reminds me of trying measure ground conductivity values for NEC simulation. Real grounds are just way too
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00113.html (11,372 bytes)
- 28. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:23:10 -0500
- It's ridiculous to draw an equivalence between a lattice tower properly resting on a pier and pin with a telephone pole, that is solid wood, and in the ground 10 feet in a tight hole made with an au
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00125.html (9,173 bytes)
- 29. [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: Courtney Judd <k4wi@k4wi.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:51:50 -0500
- Back in the 1980's after loosing several towers due to the anchors in concrete coming out of this Alabama heavy clay like they were greased, I decided to bite the bullet and spend some money. Went to
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00126.html (8,438 bytes)
- 30. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Wire Anchors (score: 1)
- Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 06:12:31 -0700
- It's ridiculous to draw an equivalence between a lattice tower properly resting on a pier and pin with a telephone pole, that is solid wood, and in the ground 10 feet in a tight hole made with an au
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2020-04/msg00128.html (10,630 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu