Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guys\s+\-\s+how\s+many\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Guys\s+\-\s+how\s+many\?\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Guys - how many? (score: 1): Author: rwing@southwind.net (Randall R. Wing); Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 21:11:42 -0600; The Rohn specification calls out 3 guys at three different heights for a 100 foot tower. The ham I got the tower from had used 5 guys instead. The 3/16" EHS is old - 30 years - so I am replacing it.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00442.html (7,260 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Guys - how many? (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 13:26:19 EST; While the LXC Prime Directive to "DO what the manufacturer says", I never discourage people from over-engineering their installation. Is the tower 25G or 45G? I don't think I'd do it for 25G - the le; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00450.html (7,704 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Guys - how many? (score: 1): Author: KI7WX@aol.com (KI7WX@aol.com); Date: Fri, 24 Dec 1999 17:33:16 EST; I'm not sure that's quite right Steve. For a 190' 25G tower my 1992 Rohn catalog shows six guys per leg. If the bottom section of a 190 foot tower can support six guy lines plus the additional weight; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00452.html (8,969 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Guys - how many? (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 14:01:29 -0600; The first question to ask is how many antennas you plan to put on the 100 ft R25 tower and where you would like to place them. K7NV has done some analysis of tower guying and reported that increasing; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00498.html (10,981 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Guys - how many? (score: 1): Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith); Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 19:46:59 +0000; Also on his web site is an analysis of various guy materials, which plays into this. As I understand his analysis, the reason using 1/4 EHS instead of 3/16, for example, is that it elongates less for; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00499.html (8,004 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]