Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HF\/VHF\s+coverage\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HF\/VHF\s+coverage\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HF/VHF coverage (score: 1): Author: WarrenWolff@aol.com; Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2004 20:02:48 EST; I will be building a home at Lake Havasu City AZ in the near future. I have absolutely no experience above 10 meters; so I need, first, some theoretical advice, then some from the locals. Should I pi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00175.html (6,975 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] HF/VHF coverage (score: 1): Author: John Silberman <blkcat28@atlantic.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 09:21:05 -0500; Hi Warren, Is it a "link" that you really want? If it is a "link" and you want to control something, you have to do it on or above 70cm. If you want to chat with another HAM, you can do it below 70cm; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00178.html (8,950 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] HF/VHF coverage (score: 1): Author: John Silberman <blkcat28@atlantic.net>; Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2004 09:36:45 -0500; Warren, If your house is 200' elevation and the antenna is on your tower will be up another 20', with no obstructions to the water, you should be able to hit a simple ground plane from your HT. Get o; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00179.html (9,081 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] HF/VHF coverage (score: 1): Author: "Paul Playford" <w8aef@worldnet.att.net>; Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 03:26:43 -0000; There is a program called Radio Mobile. This is radio propagation and virtual mapping freeware that will answer your questions for you. It is designed to show expected VHF repeater coverage but I bel; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00180.html (8,893 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]