Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HF\s+Antennas\s+\-\s+Need\s+Input\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HF\s+Antennas\s+\-\s+Need\s+Input\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: russell.newton@comcast.net (RUSS - K1LRB); Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 02:35:24 +0000; Was going for the Mosley PRO 67B or C but received alot of negative comments about them. It appears my best solution for 40 meters to 10 meters maybe 2 beam antennas - one for 40 and one for 20 to 10; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00393.html (7,361 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: wf3h@comcast.net; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:32:03 +0000; I found the PRO67B to be excellent on 20 meters. It was good on 40, mainly because other folks were using dipoles. On 10 it was so-so. It survived a number of severe ice storms, was up 15 years with; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00397.html (8,443 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:32:11 -0500; A friend put a Tennedyne T8 at 100 feet and a Cushcraft 2el 40 10 feet above on his 100 foot Rohn 45G. The mast is rotated by a Yaesu 2800. He has had excellent results with this configuration. 73, K; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00405.html (8,882 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: Jim W7RY <w7ry@centurytel.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 12:20:05 -0700; Cushcraft XM-240 @ 85' and a TH7DX @ 70' on a 70' Rohn 45G guyed with Philistran at two levels. Works EXCELLENT! You can buy a used TH7 for 200-400$ and replace all the broken worn parts for very lit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00411.html (10,389 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:32:05 -0400; Glad to hear it. Excellent compared to what? For what purpose(s) was the system designed for? Does it meet or exceed your design expectations? If you are saying excellent compared to dipoles at 30 to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00412.html (8,401 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:18:39 -0500; This is getting a bit off the original question which was: -- Was going for the Mosley PRO 67B or C but received alot of negative comments about them. It appears my best solution for 40 meters to 10; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00413.html (10,873 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] HF Antennas - Need Input (score: 1): Author: bob finger <finger@goeaston.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:38:07 -0400; Keith: My reply addressed the word "excellent". It is all a matter of what one wants the antenna array to do. I am a firm believer in stacks; I just can't afford to reconfigure just now. Food, shelte; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00414.html (9,140 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]