Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s+family\s+electrocuted\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Ham\s+Radio\s+family\s+electrocuted\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham Radio family electrocuted (score: 1): Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:27:10 -0400; I have no qualms at all putting 130' 150' from the power line. 73 Roger (K8RIK) _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00201.html (11,095 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham Radio family electrocuted (score: 1): Author: "Peter Larsen" <ve6yc@shaw.ca>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:11:01 -0600; OK, I can understand this, although from seeing things I wish I never had, I would be very cautious encroaching on the 2x rule. Here in Canada we have an OHSA rule that states you must keep all men; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00207.html (11,003 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham Radio family electrocuted (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:36:21 -0500; My guess and of course **only a guess** is that some were planning on a nice surprise for the newly upgraded Ham. Total guess. Im looking at how it was at night and it doesn't have any mention of the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00217.html (14,948 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] Ham Radio family electrocuted (score: 1): Author: "AD5VJ Bob" <rtnmi@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:52:02 -0500; I agree with John Especially after being on this reflector and hearing stories as a Ham even before the internet. But also take into consideration, that these antennas, especially some verticals seem; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-10/msg00218.html (17,756 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]