Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Help\s+for\s+a\s+New\s+Tower\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Help\s+for\s+a\s+New\s+Tower\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: Wayne Willenberg <wewill747@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:40:47 -0400; Hello, I am at the very initial stages of planning my first tower. Here is what I have done so far. I have read Steves book Up the Tower, and ARRLs Antenna Towers for Radio Amateurs. I then visited t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00536.html (8,550 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: David Robbins <k1ttt@verizon.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:48:10 -0500 (CDT); Since you have already talked to the zoning board and have the specs you must meet and since rohn doesn't provide adequate design drawings for your situation the fix is to get a qualified engineer to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00537.html (8,911 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mts.net>; Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 13:58:49 -0500; Unless your upper bracket is at 56 feet, I don't believe you'll get sign-off from the building department. At least without guys. Depending on what an engineer comes up with, you might find out the b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00538.html (10,513 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:43:12 -0400 (EDT); department told me I must meet Section 1609.1.1 (4.) of the 2006 International Building Code. The structure must meet TIA/EIA-222 for a 3-second gust of 130 MPH. (I am only 8 miles from the Atlantic; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00598.html (9,193 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: "Dick Dievendorff" <dieven@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 12:50:28 -0700; I may have been that customer. When I initially installed my crankup tower (in a notch in the roof), the (relatively sympathetic) building inspector interpreted it as "attached" since anything more t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00599.html (10,034 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: K8RI <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:22:11 -0400; Don't forget to check this out with the insurance company. Mine insisted that the tower "NOT" be attached to the house and required a rider, particularly when you figure in labor. There are also comp; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00600.html (12,167 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Help for a New Tower (score: 1): Author: Wayne Willenberg <wewill747@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 09:16:55 -0400; Checking out the insurance company that covers my house is a great idea -- I never thought of it. Thank you. _______________________________________________ __________________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00620.html (9,728 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]