Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Horizontal\s+loop\s+and\s+balun\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Horizontal\s+loop\s+and\s+balun\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Horizontal loop and balun (score: 1): Author: W8JI@contesting.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2001 20:23:18 -0400; A choke balun cares less if the load is reactive, only voltage baluns (like the W2FMI style) are load impedance critical. Placing a choke balun at the input of a tuner does nothing for balancing of; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00342.html (9,640 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Horizontal loop and balun (score: 1): Author: alsopb@gloryroad.net (alsopb); Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 11:49:09 +0000; Coax-through-bead baluns have another advantage. It is impossible to tell if they have failed from the ground or SWR reading. The only way I've been able to detect damage is if they rattle. I suppose; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00373.html (10,850 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]