Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HyGain\s+TH\-11DX\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+HyGain\s+TH\-11DX\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: MARK HAMMOND <k7hph@q.com>; Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 13:24:46 -0700; Hello All: I have been looking at the specs for the HyGain TH-11DX, 5 Band Beam. Does anyone have any experience with the performance of the TH-11DX? Is the MFJ rendition of the TH-11DX as good as th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00401.html (9,268 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:00:48 EST; Does anyone have any experience with the performance of the TH-11DX? Is the MFJ rendition of the TH-11DX as good as the HyGain rendition was? Similarities, Differences? You should take a look at our; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00410.html (7,053 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: "Gene Fuller" <w2lu@rochester.rr.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 14:32:38 -0500; Hi Steve - I haven't read your reports, but I'm a firm believer that great gain and F/B does no good if your antenna is down for repair. I like to think that being "in the air" (useable) is as,or mor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00412.html (9,546 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: Bill Winkis <kc4pe@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 16:06:12 -0500; Had a TH11 at 120 feet and on 20 meters it pretty well played with a 4 ele - 44 foot W2PV at 100 feet...... I then brought it down to 100 feet and it played well on all bands..I ended up replacing it; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00415.html (10,850 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: "David Thompson" <thompson@mindspring.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 20:16:09 -0500; The TH-11 is great especially if you want 17 and 12 meter coverage. The TH7DXX has slightly more gain on 20, 15, and 10. MFJ/Hy-Gain has had some expert help on several of the beams and verticals so; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00424.html (7,663 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: "MARK HAMMOND" <k7hph@q.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 14:52:14 -0700; Hello All: Thanks for all of your great replies. They have been very helpful. I now have a lot of good information to consider... 73, Hello All: I have been looking at the specs for the HyGain TH-11D; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00472.html (9,829 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:33:46 -0500; The information that I got was that the f/b wasn't the best on the WARC bands and that you were better of with the earlier TH-7DX ( I think that is the right number) and the A3WS WARC tribander. Just; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00473.html (11,354 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] HyGain TH-11DX (score: 1): Author: "Mike Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:38:26 -0500; Not sure why.. The Th7 is a TRIBANDER The TH11 is a 5 band beam. I'd take the 5 band antenna here. -Mike The information that I got was that the f/b wasn't the best on the WARC bands and that you wer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2011-02/msg00474.html (12,568 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]