- 1. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing a New Tower (score: 1)
- Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:22:09 +0000
- To those veterans of this reflector sri abt being a broken record but I feel compelled again to state my opinion. First my response to these types of opinions, "All that being said, if <city name> do
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00633.html (9,106 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing a New Tower (score: 1)
- Author: kb9cry@comcast.net (Phil Camera)
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 15:54:23 +0000
- " The building department refused to accept my permit application for a 72' crankup on the grounds that it is a violation of the zoning ordinance." And unfortunately, here's an example of where one h
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00635.html (7,450 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing a New Tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Alan NV8A (ex. AB2OS)" <nv8a@att.net>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 12:29:27 -0400
- I am glad to be living in Holland Township, MI: antennas/towers up to 70 ft. high used for radio/TV reception or for use by an FCC-licensed Amateur Radio operator are exempted from all regulations co
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-06/msg00641.html (11,330 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu