Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Interference\s+questions\s+dog\s+broadband\s+over\s+power\s+lines\-\s+twirp\.\.\.\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Interference questions dog broadband over power lines- twirp... (score: 1)
Author: K4FJ@aol.com
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:39:15 EST
I think the author did a fair job of reporting the issue, and I don't see the blame coming down on hams. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Suppo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00137.html (7,320 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Interference questions dog broadband over power lines- twirp... (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gilmer <n2mg1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 10:42:51 -0800 (PST)
hams. The meat of the article *seems* to be fair (alternating pro- and anti- BPL statements), but the all-important opening and closing statements seem to be biased against "us". Some would say I am
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00145.html (8,608 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Interference questions dog broadband over power lines- twirp... (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gilmer <n2mg1@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:03:40 -0800 (PST)
I wrote them (I clicked the "Send feedback" link at the bottom of the article) with my observations. In response I got a very nice response for a managing editor (she's a ham no less) saying that the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00148.html (8,531 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu