- 1. [TowerTalk] Inv. L support coupling to counterpoise (score: 1)
- Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 14:54:11 +0000
- I have a question for those of you who operate with inverted Ls or any other suspended monopole configuration held over a counterpose by a metal support structure. As you are probably aware, a signif
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00126.html (7,887 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Inv. L support coupling to counterpoise (score: 1)
- Author: Lee Buller <k0wa@swbell.net>
- Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2005 12:41:31 -0800 (PST)
- I have an inverted-L which is rather an inverted-L with a bad slope from the top of the tower. I lost my 70 foot tree a couple of years ago to one of our Kansas winds and I had to tie the end of the
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00130.html (8,451 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] Inv. L support coupling to counterpoise (score: 1)
- Author: "Rob Atkinson, K5UJ" <k5uj@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:04:50 +0000
- okay Lee, thanks for the report. It may turn out that it doesn't matter that much. I will ask the broadcast engineers also. I believe the practice, when hanging a wire skirt for an AM on a grounded F
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00148.html (7,760 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu