Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+L\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: jim@kc4hw.net (Jim Johnson); Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 15:03:09 -0400; What is the formula for figuring the appropriate length of an inverted L? Unfortunately, my Antenna Handbook does not contain that information. Nor was I able to find it in ON4UN's Low-Band DXing. Wh; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00768.html (6,832 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: k2av@contesting.com (Guy Olinger, K2AV); Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 21:38:22 -0400; Pattern, feed, etc all depend on the overall length of the inverted L compared to the wavelength of the frequency in use. For instance, an inverted L 65 feet up and 65 feet out can be used: a) on 160; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00779.html (10,299 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: edbruns@juno.com (Edward L. Bruns); Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 01:11:58 -0500; Use 170' and a 500 pf "breadslicer" in series to get where you want to go..that 240' "counterpoise" sounds long. Ed, W3EKT. ___________________________________________________________________ Why pay; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00275.html (6,920 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Edward L Bruns <edbruns@juno.com>; Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 20:40:41 +0000; I have always fed several dipoles with one coax, so why not do the same with an Inverted L? As many as you like all fed with a common feedline. It was in the 50s today so added eight 80 foot radials; /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00771.html (6,821 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: <doktorij@bellsouth.net>; Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 8:41:13 -0400; Hi Eugene, This sight is worth bookmarking and refering to when it comes to antennas: http://cebik.com/radio.html http://www.cebik.com/wire/ltv.html on inverted L shapes. http://www.cebik.com/fdim/fd; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00545.html (7,997 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Nick Pair <daweezil2003@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 13:12:40 -0700 (PDT); Your link is anecdotal with out consideration to radiation E and H patterns. The chicken wire would dissolve in two years or so in the soil around here.(it rusts above ground in a little over a year.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00522.html (7,447 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <na8w@hotmail.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:31:36 -0500; I am considering erecting an Inverted L antenna when the weather cooperates. I need opinions on whether to go with a buried radial system or if an elevated counterpoise would work better. Thanks Darl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00222.html (6,434 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Darl Deeds" <ddeeds@thewavz.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:47:15 -0500; I am considering erecting an Inverted L antenna when the weather cooperates. I need opinions on whether to go with a buried radial system or if an elevated counterpoise would work better. Thanks Darl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00226.html (6,826 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:13:02 -0500; After researching the matter, I elected to put at least 36 ground radials 40 feet long, I will add more longer ones later when the weather clears, for my big vertical antenna. I would do the same for; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-01/msg00228.html (8,304 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 11:00:41 -0400; Hey Gang, I've decided to replace my existing 56 ft TV Evans 17/80 trapped dipole with something a tad different. As I have the mast, etc, I'm planning on an inverted L for 80m (Hey, I have a beam fo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00305.html (7,017 bytes)
11. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 15:32:30 -0400; I take it that you are going to run out a few radials. A choke balun at the inverted L feedpoint would not hurt. Mark N1UK Hey Gang, I've decided to replace my existing 56 ft TV Evans 17/80 trapped d; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00314.html (7,716 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted L (score: 1): Author: <john@kk9a.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 17:50:39 -0500; I would definitely use a choke. The vertical will likely be less than 50 ohms so you may want to consider matching it with a hairpin or possibly an impedance changing un-un. John KK9A Hey Gang, I've; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00315.html (7,307 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]