Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+vee\s+characteristics\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Inverted\s+vee\s+characteristics\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Inverted vee characteristics (score: 1): Author: "Richard DiDonna NN3W" <nn3w@cox.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 13:09:28 -0400; For the upcoming contest season, I'm planning on putting up a 3 element inverted vee beam. The beam would have a common reflector and two driven elements - I would use the driven element/reflector pa; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00879.html (7,310 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted vee characteristics (score: 1): Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 11:21:27 -0700; ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY FOLLOWS -- You really should model it with EZNEC or a similar program, but I can tell you this: Even at a 45 degree apex angle, an inverted vee is almost perfectly omnidire; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00881.html (7,679 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Inverted vee characteristics (score: 1): Author: "Merlin-7 KI4ILB" <merlin-7@sc.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 22:50:46 +0100; less than 90 or 60 degrees) that winds up making the antenna essentially two verticals fed from the top? My antenna is a dipole at 60 degrees with 3 elements on each side, 66' 33' and 16' before tun; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00892.html (8,296 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]