Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Isotron\s+Antennas\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Isotron\s+Antennas\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: "WA6RKN" <WA6RKN@ARRL.net>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:10:01 -0800; If you gentle readers would bear with me while I take an excursion into some antenna type questions.... Specifically, the Isotron Antenna. Being a skeptic, this antenna sounds too good to be true.. S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00655.html (9,027 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Dan Hearn" <n5ar@air-pipe.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 09:44:49 -0800; Joe, pick up a copy of March CQ magazine and p 50 has a nice article re your problem. The simple truth is that most "tiny antennas" use the coax feedline as the antenna. This may or may not be the in; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00666.html (11,897 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: Pete Smith <n4zr@contesting.com>; Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:35:46 -0500; It is a joke - much less effective than one of the MFJ compact loop antennas, or the original compact loop if you can find one. I remember that KA9FGOX won Sweepstakes low power one year from Puerto; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00001.html (8,574 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:07:41 -0600; Yes, if you are running 100 watts or less then take a good look at those magnetic loop antennas. They seem to work very well indeed. I worked an Italian station on 20m ssb and he was using a loop ant; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00007.html (10,282 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 12:15:49 EST; antennas, or the original compact loop if you can find one. I remember that KA9FOX won Sweepstakes low power one year from Puerto Rico using one of the originals. Well, the efficiency surely is very; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00010.html (7,735 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: Bill MacLane <ai4wm@yahoo.com>; Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:45:58 -0800 (PST); These make nice light shows at night other than that they do not work worth a hoot. Maybe at low power like 5 or 10 watts they'd work, but the inefficiency will eat up that small amount of power. 73; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00013.html (8,658 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Isotron Antennas (score: 1): Author: Tom Cox <tomcox@iquest.net>; Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 17:12:13 -0600; The consensus on the antenneX antenna discussion lists, and in several articles in the magazine (www.antennex.com) is that the Isotron and similar devices (the EH, the CFA, etc.) are, at best, a mean; /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00020.html (16,225 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]