Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KLM\s+40M4\s+\-v\-\s+M2\s+40M4L\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KLM\s+40M4\s+\-v\-\s+M2\s+40M4L\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] KLM 40M4 -v- M2 40M4L (score: 1): Author: beaton@wintermute.co.uk (Alastair Beaton); Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 19:09:41 +0100; 'Lo Towertalkians, I heartily concur with the comments on the reliability of the KLM, having spent several hours during CQWW fixing the loose shorting straps. Is M2's 40M-series any better? 73 Al, GM; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00132.html (7,514 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] KLM 40M4 -v- M2 40M4L (score: 1): Author: clive@gm3poi.prestel.co.uk (clive penna); Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 23:34:18 +0100; Hi Al, No the M2 is definitely not better. I had a 4el 40m manufactured to a 125mph spec. The linear loading fell apart several times at wind speeds of around 65mph. I rebuilt it and tried several ti; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-07/msg00139.html (8,329 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]