Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KT\-34XA\s+tuning\s+$long$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+KT\-34XA\s+tuning\s+$long$\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: Chad_Kurszewski@csg.mot.com (WE9V Chad Kurszewski); Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 16:02:12 -0500; Hi All, I'm about to put up the first KT-34XA this weekend. Upon checking the SWR, it wasn't too close to the published curves, especially on 15M. The antenna: KT-34XA Brand new Blue Insulators insta; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00577.html (10,808 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: k2kv@reallybig.com (Jeff Singer); Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 18:41:57 -0400; Chad - I've built (and rebuilt) a number of kt-34A & -XA antennas, and have always enjoyed superb swr and performance. Besides the problem of occasionally having to dip the tubes into the pool to get; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00578.html (14,239 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: k6ll@juno.com (k6ll@juno.com); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 03:45:01 +0100; Chad, I have a kt34xa that was assembled according to the factory dimensions. The swr is so flat across the band that I wouldn't consider tinkering with the element lengths. The gain seems to be very; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00588.html (11,203 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: k3mm@erols.com (Tyler Stewart); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 03:58:13 +0100; Yeah, but usually any ground coupling will cause the resonant frequency to be lower, not higher. Something is wrong with Chad's antenna on 15. 73 es GL Chad, Ty K3MM --Original Message-- From: Jeff S; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00589.html (16,066 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: baycock@hiwaay.net (Bill Aycock); Date: Tue, 22 Sep 1998 23:45:38 -0500; I have heard you mention doing everything except getting rid of that tuned length line. I would reset the elements to the mfg specs, and get another line (NOT the same length) and try again. Every go; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00590.html (9,342 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:25:43 EDT; I was having 15M fits with my old KT34A and the SWR problem went away when I changed the feedline length. Cheers, Steve K7LXC Champion Radio Products -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertal; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00597.html (8,128 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: D. Rodman, MD" <rodman@acsu.buffalo.edu (D. Rodman, MD); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:28:32 -0400 (EDT); Chad, I am NOT familiar with your antenna. BUT I just tuned and adjusted two new 15 meter antennas and learned quite a bit. I wanted to share this and think it might help. First, everyone says pointi; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00598.html (9,715 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: Chad_Kurszewski@csg.mot.com (WE9V Chad Kurszewski); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:09:19 -0500; Thanks for all the reply so far, I'm sure there's more to come... keep them coming! To answer/dispell some questions: Antenna pointing straight up: I have used the antennas pointing straight up metho; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00600.html (13,178 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] KT-34XA tuning (long) (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (w8ji.tom); Date: Wed, 23 Sep 1998 10:11:47 -0400; Hi Bill, tuned another a something If the line is 50 ohm line, SWR will not change with line length when measured by a 259B. It also will not change in real life with line length changes if the line; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00601.html (8,378 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]