Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-240\s+Ultraflex\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-240\s+Ultraflex\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] LMR-240 Ultraflex (score: 1): Author: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:39:46 -0500; I'm noting the power carrying capability and wondering if anyone's had any experience with this coax ( LMR240 ultraflex). Seems like it would be ideal for high power patch cables, since it's much mor; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00490.html (7,695 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-240 Ultraflex (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:45:34 -0800; Power handling is current and voltage... Current is limited by the thermal dissipation in the inner conductor (and the thermal resistance to the outside...) Voltage is limited by dielectric breakdown; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00491.html (9,303 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-240 Ultraflex (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:51:30 -0800; Ooops, that was the peak power limit... The average power limit is much lower... Looking lower down on the data sheet...at 30MHz, they give 1.49 kW average. Applying the same 6dB margin for mismatch,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00492.html (8,680 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-240 Ultraflex (score: 1): Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:37:19 -0600; Yes, it is well shielded and will handle a kilowatt. However, loss is about double the larger RG8/213, LMR400 and other .4 inch cable. Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesti; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00505.html (9,106 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]