Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-600\s+cable\s+bends\s+in\s+conduit\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\-600\s+cable\s+bends\s+in\s+conduit\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] LMR-600 cable bends in conduit (score: 1): Author: "Allen R. Brier" <britech@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 23:22:43 -0600; Do you see any problem with 2" conduit using wide 90's (total: 2)? Allen Ross Brier, N5XZ SET BriTech Systems Incorporated NICET Fire Alarm Level IV NICET Sp. Hazards / Sprinkler Systems Level I 1515; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00733.html (31,924 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-600 cable bends in conduit (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on TowerTalk" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 01:48:20 -0500; Sweep 90's should work. Standard 90's are pushing the minimum radius bends and I'd think would be a bear to pull through. I'm going through three 45's and one sweep 90 although I don't have all the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00735.html (39,067 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-600 cable bends in conduit (score: 1): Author: "Bob Maser" <bmaser@tampabay.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 06:52:46 -0500; Why not use a run of LMR900 like I did. Most LMR900 is DB which stands for Direct Bury coax. Or you can find some Andrews 7/8" which is also DB. Control lines are another issue and shouldn't be run t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00739.html (43,024 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]