Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+LMR\s+and\s+CNT\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Rob Atkinson" <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 12:22:45 -0500
My advice--if you are considering going with LMR or CNT and the cost of a run of one of them, you may as well spend a bit more and go with 1/2 inch heliax LDF4-50 and get it over with. There's always
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00469.html (7,008 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:26:34 -0400
We all have different viewpoints. I replaced LDF4-50 with LR-600. For my use (laying on the ground from the shop to the tower 6-pack and then up the tower) I found the Andrew to be more fragile, (eas
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00470.html (9,239 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Michael Ryan" <mryan001@tampabay.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:07:30 -0400
Interesting comments on the cables. I was under the impression that LMR-600 UF ( ultra flex ) was plenty flexible to use up the tower including the rotator loop area. It looks and feels heavy but doe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00471.html (11,334 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:42:33 -0400
My only complaint about LMR-400 UF is the jacket which appears to be a rubber like material with poor resistance to abrasion and has not held up well. I had to replace it once when the pins in the ma
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00473.html (13,597 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Mel Whitten" <mel@melwhitten.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 21:29:07 -0500
LMR 400UF Weatherability: LMR-400-UF cables are designed for outdoor exposure and have a life expectancy in excess of 10 years. LMR 400 Weatherability: LMR-400 cables designed for outdoor exposure in
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00474.html (16,056 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Julio Peralta" <jperalta4@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 07:56:51 -0400
I can give you positive results. I'm using 600UF for preamp to antenna feed point connections including around the rotor on my VHF-UHF antenna systems and have had no problems in the 2 years it's bee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00485.html (12,258 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR and CNT (score: 1)
Author: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 17:38:09 -0400
I decided to go with a mix of LMR-600UF and Davis Bury Flex. As I mentioned I'd not had the best of luck with the 400UF but it had lead a hard life so I want to get the 600 UF a try. I still plan on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00487.html (14,702 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu