Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+Damage\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Carpenter" <Bruce.Carpenter@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 15:20:13 -0400
Les I have read the message you posted on the lightning protection forum. First, we must recognize that no level of protection will totally protect electronic equipment from lightning damage. We can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00326.html (13,025 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:32:24 -0700
Better not to think of it as a transmission line, rather, a straight inductance. 8 feet is about 2-3 microhenries (in a straight line). If the full stroke current flows through it, the voltage can be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00330.html (17,161 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:13:23 -0700
Hi Jim, Shunt suppressors should terminate to ground (preferably at a SPG bulkhead) not another parallel conductor. BTW, I am not familiar with series suppressors (my own ignorance) other than the se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00332.html (10,185 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:46:57 -0700
Series-mode suppressors have been developed that are quite effective on power line branch circuits. They work by storing the strike voltage in a very large inductor, then discharging it slowly once t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00335.html (9,551 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:36:51 -0700
One example would be a series L followed by a shunt C (yes.. a low pass filter).. In a typical transient, the real problem is the high peak voltage, not necessarily the actual energy in the transient
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00338.html (9,604 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: "Bruce Carpenter" <Bruce.Carpenter@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:35:24 -0400
Jim Your are correct in all of your comments and I agree fully. I did not go to that level of detail as I was trying to keep my comments relatively simple. The reason I mentioned that non UL listed d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-08/msg00359.html (19,706 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu