Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+solution\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lightning\s+solution\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: w2up@itw.com (Barry Kutner); Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 13:15:43 +0000; There have been some interesting theories proposed lately, such as leaving your tower and antennas ungrounded so as not to attract lightning. Here's a better one, follow my logic... The W2UP thereom; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00087.html (8,295 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: w8ji.tom@MCIONE.com (Tom Rauch); Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 11:18:24 +0000; To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Grounded or ungrounded, it makes no difference for the "attraction". Nice logical theorem snipped out, love the plastic wrap idea. My neighbor uses a jug of saltwater f; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00090.html (8,917 bytes)
3. Fwd: [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: TOMK5RC@aol.com (TOMK5RC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 11:48:30 EDT; This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --part0_896888912_boundary Content-ID: <0_896888912@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII --part0_896888912_boundary Content; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00093.html (10,182 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: nx4d@gate.net (DOUG WALLER); Date: Wed, 03 Jun 1998 12:17:32 -0400; Very good Barry, I really liked some of your points. Think some of them were TIC, but here is my Lightning anti-strike theory: Sometime back I visited shack of NS5M, whereby I saw a huge knife switch; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00096.html (12,381 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: K7LXC@aol.com (K7LXC@aol.com); Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 13:20:33 EDT; Duh! The 40 foot tower is probably within the 'cone of protection' afforded by the 90 foot trees. He could stand on one leg singing Yankee Doodle and achieve the same results. The problem is that a t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00100.html (9,337 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: k1ttt@berkshire.net (David Robbins); Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 01:03:22 +0000; a low impedance path to ground doesn't prevent strikes. in fact the low impedance path will allow more charge from the ground to flow onto the tower and probably increase the chance that the tower wo; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00111.html (8,128 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] Lightning solution (score: 1): Author: aa0cy@nwrain.com (Bob Wanderer); Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 18:27:35 -0700; No, Barry, you need two D cells, four if you live in the southeastern US 73, Bob AA0CY There have been some interesting theories proposed lately, such as leaving your tower and antennas ungrounded so; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00117.html (8,990 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]