Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loops\s+vs\s+dipoles\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Loops\s+vs\s+dipoles\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Loops vs dipoles (score: 1): Author: rodbrink@montereybay.com (Rod Brink); Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 09:40:04 -0700; I've frequently seen it written that loops are "quieter" receiving antennas than dipoles. The usual explanation is because the loop is a "closed-circuit antenna". I've always been a little suspicious; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00216.html (6,973 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Loops vs dipoles (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 19:43:21 -0500; Many years ago I had a 2 el quad and a TA33 tri bander at the same QTH. Quad was much quieter during rain showers, and a little bit quieter the rest of the time. Quad also required lots of repairs, a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00219.html (7,740 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]