Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Lossy\s+Traps\s+\(really\s+long\)\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (really long) (score: 1)
Author: "Tony Brock-Fisher" <barockteer@aol.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:03:38 -0400
The issue of lossy traps is only one of a number of factors that enter into antenna comparison and selection. The real question is which antenna is best for you? And of course, there is no simple or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00636.html (17,232 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (really long) (score: 1)
Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 09:29:08 -0400
Tony, Thanks a lot for sharing this - I appreciate the thoughtful effort you put into this and your willingness to share with us. Now, I'd like to ask for a copy of the rebuild treatise. I recently g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00641.html (19,729 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Lossy Traps (really long) (score: 1)
Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 06:46:00 -0700
Excellent writeup! So, the net result is that the traps result in losses of a few tenths dB. I would assert that this is down in the noise level when it comes to (i.e. you might see this amount of ch
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00642.html (9,177 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu