Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Magic\s+Length\s+for\s+160\-40\s+vertical\?\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Kirk Kleinschmidt via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 05:41:02 +0000 (UTC)
Hi, gang, I'm in a bit of a race against the clock (the winter clock), and I'm trying to get a vertical up in the back yard that might be useful on 160-40. (Never used a vertical before, but I wanna.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00069.html (8,721 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 08:40:20 -0700
Tie the feed wires together and operate the existing antenna as a top loaded vertical. Forget about all the other ideas you mentioned. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ ______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00072.html (7,163 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 09:18:03 -0700
Hi Kirk To get the feel of a vertical, could you try shorting the feedline of the dipole together at the shack end and load it up as a top loaded vertical (with some radials of course)? Might be bett
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00073.html (10,689 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 12:29:02 -0400
I have suspended a T antenna from two 50' foot towers and a 50'drop wire...adjust the T to give a good match on 1.8 against ground. (A few radials will do. Them with two additional drop wires on insu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00074.html (11,080 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: "Steve Jones" <n6sj@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 10:10:39 -0700
I second Rick's suggestion. I have an 80M dipole up about 80 feet fed with open wire line. On 160M I short the feedline together in the shack, and with an antenna tuner use it as a top-loaded vertica
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00076.html (9,210 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Kirk Kleinschmidt via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 19:05:25 +0000 (UTC)
Regarding the top-loaded doublet idea: I planned to do this, and I have the relays and the goodies on hand to implement it. My potential problem is, the 35-foot support tower is bracketed to the side
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00077.html (12,550 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Magic Length for 160-40 vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 21:38:26 -0700
You have RF in the shack because you have no radials or counterpoise! AND the antenna will work a LOT better with a counterpoise. Anything from radials to a K2AV folded counterpoise to something impr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-11/msg00084.html (9,506 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu