Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+March\s+QST\s+cover\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+March\s+QST\s+cover\s*$/: 46 ]

Total 46 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Rob Atkinson <ranchorobbo@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 05:51:11 -0600; Has anyone else here seen the totally idiotic QST cover for the March issue? If not take a look: http://wirelessestimator.com/articles/2017/cover-girl-climber-shot-could-send-high-schoolers-to-their-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00500.html (6,997 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: W4AAW@aol.com via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:43:35 -0500; Bob, You are correct! QST has become, for me, totally useless. 73 Mike W4AAW Has anyone else here seen the totally idiotic QST cover for the March issue? If not take a look: http://wirelessestimator.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00501.html (8,193 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: knowkode@verizon.net; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:56:31 -0500; Rob, Agreed. However, rather than league bashing on this forum, I would encourage every league member to contact their section mgr, division director, and everyone they can think of in Newington. The; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00502.html (8,201 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Bill Cotter <n4lg@qx.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:27:15 -0500; Another stupid cover is the September 2015 QST issue showing the Christmas tree of mobile radios and multiple display units in a truck cab. How can we seriously tell our children and friends not to t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00503.html (9,121 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Patrick Greenlee <patrick_g@windstream.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:40:49 -0600; A correction needs to be published to point out unsafe issues illustrated by the cover shot. There are, however, no facts in evidence that the girl was in danger. This was quite likely a posed shot w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00504.html (9,527 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: EZ Rhino <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 06:57:42 -0700; Funny, I wrote a thing about this last week when I received the QST in the mail, and decided not to send it to the TT reflector so I deleted it. I wanted to see if anyone else noticed it. Couple poin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00505.html (11,701 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Mike Ricketts <mike.nd9g@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:27:53 -0600; This topic came up on Reddit right after the digital issue came out. A couple of quick points. 1. The photo was apparently supplied by the Eldorado Space Program (Eldorado, TX), which is a school pro; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00506.html (11,932 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 06:58:12 -0800; A couple of quick points. 1. The photo was apparently supplied by the Eldorado Space Program (Eldorado, TX), which is a school program at the high school. ( https://goo.gl/wx9OIM) So it seems the lea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00507.html (10,155 bytes)
9. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: "Jeff DePolo" <jd0@broadsci.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:01:02 -0500; It should probably be noted that there are no regulations regarding safety procedures that apply to amateurs doing work on their own towers, or otherwise doing work on a tower for non-work-related pu; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00508.html (9,290 bytes)
10. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Charles Farr <cefarr@hughes.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 07:55:34 -0800; Seems to me, that way too much emotion is involved here. Any opportunity to bash the ARRL, and it's publications appears to be more important than providing real solutions to observed errors. I think; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00509.html (10,844 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: "Anthony W. DePrato" <wa4jqs@mikrotec.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:06:27 -0500; GREAT Now we will have another 500 useless messages. with nothing to do with towers..we all know it was staged. so lets get back to towers. 73 Tony WA4JQS Anthony W.DePrato WA4JQS since 1962 CQ DX HA; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00510.html (9,116 bytes)
12. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: william radice <k4owr@outlook.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:12:33 +0000; Would you deny this group the opportunity to beat yet another dead horse having nothing to do with it's name....Tower Talk?? How dare you? Oops, this message alone will likely start another avalanche; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00511.html (9,692 bytes)
13. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:18:30 -0700; Learning the proper way to tie into a climbing harness is hardly unimportant or unrelated to the nature of this group. It's keeps you from going splat. Flogging the ARRL for printing the photo IS bea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00512.html (10,549 bytes)
14. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:22:59 -0800; Oo I'd argue that since the picture in question is actually of someone climbing a tower, and whether the picture: a) represents safe climbing practice b) encourages safe climbing practice it's pretty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00513.html (9,770 bytes)
15. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: W4AAW@aol.com via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:31:00 -0500; Criticism is not always "bashing." No magazine is above criticism by its subscribers. Expressing disappointment is just that: Expressing disappointment. When a subscriber to a magazine is displeased,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00514.html (10,867 bytes)
16. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: William Marx <bmarx@bellsouth.net>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:41:40 -0500; Here here! _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00515.html (9,151 bytes)
17. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Big Don <bigdon39@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:19:49 -0800; The editors were likely too distracted by the Cover_Babe to pay much attention to the finer points of tower-climbing equipment. Think of it as something akin to a QST Swimsuit Issue.... Don N7EF ____; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00516.html (10,488 bytes)
18. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: mike.lyon@gmail.com; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 09:25:15 -0800; Thank god i wasnt the only one that thought that... Wire tires on her support rope? The fall arrest which should be placed above her... Then, their is a tower safety article in that edition of QST. Q; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00517.html (11,363 bytes)
19. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Wes Stewart <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:52:59 -0700; Then, their is a tower safety article in that edition of QST. Their is? Is it called, "How knot two tie a tye?" _______________________________________________ _______________________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00518.html (8,609 bytes)
20. Re: [TowerTalk] March QST cover (score: 1): Author: Tom Osborne <w7why1@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 10:00:44 -0800; I was just looking at an antenna article in an older ARRL publication last night and it showed an inverted 'L' for 160. It had one radial. They claim the gain is 3dB in the direction of the radial la; /archives//html/Towertalk/2017-02/msg00519.html (9,592 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]