Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mast\s+stiffness\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mast\s+stiffness\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mast stiffness (score: 1): Author: "Jim Jarvis" <jimjarvis@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 10:39:55 -0500; When this thread started, I just KNEW someone would throw in Viagra. At the outset, this was about some 2.5" od, 0.5" wall 24' STEEL masts. The complaint was, "they flexed more than I was comfortable; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00011.html (8,454 bytes)
2. RE: [TowerTalk] Mast stiffness (score: 1): Author: "Rex Lint" <rex@lint.mv.com>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 11:57:25 -0500; It would be about 400 lbs! de K1HI _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00020.html (7,221 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mast stiffness (score: 1): Author: Wayne Davidson <wdavidson@tower-structures.com>; Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2005 10:11:02 -0800; This type of deflection problem is well known to structural engineers. The problem may be associated with vortex shedding and structural resonance. In which case, the pipe may go through very substan; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00026.html (10,388 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]