Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Military\s+Aircraft\s+Bearing\s+OK\s+for\s+Tower\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Military\s+Aircraft\s+Bearing\s+OK\s+for\s+Tower\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Military Aircraft Bearing OK for Tower? (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:57:35 -0400; Just came upon this and it appears that it may have a new home on Ham towers http://www.american-milspec.com/p940.html What spec am I missing that makes it not useful as a mast bearing, please? The $; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00821.html (7,364 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Military Aircraft Bearing OK for Tower? (score: 1): Author: "K8RI on Tower talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 02:35:17 -0400; Can you imagine the original cost of that thing? <:-)) A centering method? Should be easily taken care of with a little thought. Roger Halstead (K8RI and ARRL 40 year Life Member) N833R - World's old; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00825.html (8,827 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Military Aircraft Bearing OK for Tower? (score: 1): Author: N7KA@comcast.net; Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 13:46:40 +0000; This bearing was manufactured by Parker-Hannifan in Irvine, CA. The CAGE number made easy work of finding the mfr. Arne N7KA -- Original message -- _______________________________________________ See; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00831.html (8,770 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Military Aircraft Bearing OK for Tower? (score: 1): Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>; Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:01:08 -0400; Hey you guys! I placed my order for a bearing and it was several days before he accepted the PayPal payment ... and now he just E-mailed to say that he had sold out and had reimbursed me! Y'all clean; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00149.html (7,908 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]