Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mobile\s+Towers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mobile\s+Towers\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 12:10:56 -0400; Look at all the pictures. The first one makes the tower look very long, but its actually two trailers. The base of the tower is on the trailer and the top over the tongue. I doubt the assembly is muc; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00321.html (7,726 bytes)
2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jim@rhodesend.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:45:44 -0600; And they are pretty light weight towers. Look close, the diagonals are tubing and the whole thing is bolted together. Designed to be guyed at the top of all 3 sections. Maybe for very temporary use w; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00323.html (8,352 bytes)
3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 10:39:38 -0700; I'll bet not guyed.. Crankups don't usually guy on the top because it puts loads on the hoist cable. They deploy these things with some lightweight antenna (wireless network, mini cell site, somethi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00326.html (8,161 bytes)
4. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jim@rhodesend.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 13:43:51 -0600; The tops of all three sections have guy points. Every temporary cell site tower I have ever seen were all guyed at the top if each section. Yes, most ham type crank ups are not designed for guying th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00332.html (9,247 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 17:47:44 -0400; These towers are temporary cell site towers to handle situations like Katrina and areas of population growth make it a requirement to maintain phone communications. IMHO they would be ideal for ARRL; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00338.html (10,634 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:03:25 -0700; I'd think that's a "dont fall on someone restraint" more than a "support the tower in a strong wind" kind of guying. unless the hoist cable and hardware were really burly compared to the guying. If t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00340.html (9,240 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: Steve Maki <lists@oakcom.org>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:02:24 -0400; The tops of all three sections have guy points. Every temporary cell site tower I have ever seen were all guyed at the top if each section. Yes, most ham type crank ups are not designed for guying t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00344.html (9,913 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] Mobile Towers (score: 1): Author: Jim Rhodes <jim@rhodesend.net>; Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 20:28:14 -0500; Yes, I think some of it is "make sure the tower falls in a heap", upon close inspection the towers seem to be pretty light construction. Bracing diagonals are tubing and bolted together. Might be OK; /archives//html/Towertalk/2016-09/msg00345.html (11,050 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]