Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+Guy\s+Anchors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+More\s+Guy\s+Anchors\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: gscholten@michamber, com@vixa.voyager.net (Gale); Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 19:52:16 -0400; Round guy anchor bases rea OK IF properly designed. Example: 80 feet 45G, 90 MPH wind, and 14 sq ft antenna load Guy anchor pull out force is 2400 # upward and 2600# toward the tower. The force in li; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg00003.html (10,880 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: csudds@probe.net (Chuck Sudds); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 14:03:26 -0500; I am getting ready to install my 80ft of Rohn 45G. I have the base and all three of the guy-anchor spots marked off, out in my "North 40." Rather than manually digging these holes, I was planning on; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01005.html (8,206 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: n3rr@erols.com (Bill Hider); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 16:41:51 -0400; Yes, Chuck, I see a big problem: NO ENGINEERING (at least none-apparent in the post) That includes determining information such as: The maximum load that will be put on the guys during operation (plu; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01006.html (10,298 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: n7ml@imt.net (Michael Lamb); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:57:16 -0600; Chuck: It seems to me that you put concrete under a guyed tower to keep it from sinking into the ground because of the vertical component of forces from the guy wires. I think you would be far better; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01009.html (9,102 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: dave@egh.com (dave@egh.com); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 18:56:07 EDT; Hi Mike, When you mention about putting concrete under a guyed tower, I believe the purpose of it is not to prevent sinking as much as it is to prevent the tower base from kicking out sideways from t; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01010.html (7,875 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 20:24:42 -0600; What lateral forces at the base of the tower? Don't the guy wires balance all the lateral forces at their attachment points? I always thought so. And, to my mind, the purpose of a base is to prevent; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01019.html (9,513 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: ke4rna@Traveller.COM (Donnie Murray (KE4RNA)); Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 21:19:56 +0000; I just got through installing 80 feet of Rohn 45G. I have some good advice. Use Rohn specs on everything. The depth of the holes, the geometry of the holes, the distance from the tower base for the; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01023.html (10,357 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: n4kg@juno.com (T A RUSSELL); Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 06:48:10 -0600; The engineer was RIGHT ON ! The only lateral forces I can visualize at the base of a tower result from the wind load of the tower between the base and first set of guy wires, and that load is divided; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01034.html (9,288 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] More Guy Anchors (score: 1): Author: k1vr@juno.com (Fred Hopengarten); Date: Tue, 30 Jun 1998 13:22:43 EDT; K1VR: I'd be afraid that one of those suckers might just pop out of the ground if it gets saturated with the kinds of rains we've had here in the NE the past few weeks. Rohn specifies compacted soil; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-06/msg01041.html (8,469 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]