Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mosley\s+PRO\s+57\s+B40\s+HD\s+on\s+Versatower\s+M60\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: "Geert Hofman" <Geert_Hofman@Jabil.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 16:27:41 +0100
Hi, I am new to this reflector, so maybe asking a question already raised... sorry... I am contemplating buying a Mosley PRO 57 B 40 HD. My rotor is able to turn this thing , but I am still a bit con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00009.html (7,781 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: Chris Pedder <chris@g3vbl.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 15:42:07 +0000
Geert, I am sure that other will be able to comment on the Mosley, but I would certainly be worried about having such a large antenna atop the Versatower in 80 Km/hr winds. As I recall, the most comm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00010.html (7,970 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: Peter Chadwick <g3rzp@g3rzp.wanadoo.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 21:36:01 +0200 (CEST)
Versatower in 80 Km/hr winds. < And me - unguyed, anyway. The heavy duty one certainly is. I have the 4 section heavy duty one, which I've ended up having at 62 feet because I can't get the guys far
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00013.html (7,900 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 22:24:43 +0200
I would not do that unguyed at 80km/h, the Pro57 is quite a large antenna. The problem is mainly to retract it on higher wind speeds, you will need an additional winch for pulling it down http://www.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00014.html (8,856 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Osborne" <w7why@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:11:13 -0700
Hi All Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought guying a crankup tower was a no-no. Too much downward forces. Did I seee that somewhere? 73 Tom W7WHY _______________________________________________ _______
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00015.html (8,247 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2006 23:27:38 +0200
My 100 foot mobile Versatower crankup MUST be guyed. I guess the additional downward force has been calculated for the size of wires and pulleys 73 Peter Maybe I'm mistaken, but I thought guying a cr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00016.html (8,281 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:45:40 -0700
You did.. however, if the mfr has designed it for guying, then it would (obviously) be ok. You might also have a tower which is "safety guyed" in that the guys aren't there to hold it up (as in a sta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00017.html (10,048 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 14:55:39 -0700
http://www.fli.co.uk/Versatower/ The opening photo shows guys (slack on the upper sections before extension).. One assumes that they've designed it appropriately. Some years back, I was starting on d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00018.html (10,358 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley PRO 57 B40 HD on Versatower M60 (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Voelpel" <df3kv@t-online.de>
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2006 00:18:58 +0200
That is how the large towers of the russian contest stations are guyed 73 Peter Depending on the loads, one could use cleverly designed winches to both store the guys (in the retracted position) and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00020.html (8,359 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu