- 1. [TowerTalk] Mosley matching systems (score: 1)
- Author: rmurad@domain.com.br (rmurad)
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 07:49:48 -0200
- Hi, TowerTalkians, Recently I E-Mailed Mosley twice but I did not get any answer. I'd like to know about their various matching systems and the differences among them. Their WEB page mentions four sy
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00224.html (7,869 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] Mosley matching systems (score: 1)
- Author: n4kg@juno.com (n4kg@juno.com)
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 05:14:13 -0600
- My understanding of the Mosley-Match is just a split dipole feed. The Classic-Match uses a slightly longer driven element (inductive) and then runs a piece of RG-8/U center conductor and dielectric d
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00226.html (9,437 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] Mosley matching systems (score: 1)
- Author: N4CW@aol.com (N4CW@aol.com)
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 11:05:35 EST
- My old TA-36 (vintage unknown, but precedes the "Classic" series) has a unique feed. The trapped driven element is insulated and fed at the center in a balanced fashion. However, the coax from the st
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00230.html (7,936 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Mosley matching systems (score: 1)
- Author: n4zr@contesting.com (Pete Smith)
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 17:54:36 +0000
- in Sounds like a lossy T-match, using the capacitance of the RG-8. I don't see how there can be a transformation to unbalanced taking place in a symmetrical feed system, so if it were me I'd put a be
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00236.html (8,750 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Mosley matching systems (score: 1)
- Author: perring@texas.net (Bob Perring)
- Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 12:07:14 -0600
- ==> I could never ever figure out how they were transforming anything in that double stub piece of joined and potted coax that they supplied with the original TA-36. We just used old BN-86 baluns or
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00237.html (8,684 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu