Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TowerTalk\]\s+Mountain\s+top\s+multi\s+tower\s+QTH\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 20:03:54 -0700
We all dream of that perfect site - 1000' above all else for 360 degrees. I found such a site, but so did 6 or so commercial tower/transmitter operators before me. The towers range from 100 to 250',
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00259.html (7,858 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 06:31:26 -0700
If there is an AM broadcast tower there, especially a multi-tower directional array, something you want to do could distort their pattern. That could lead to problems. An AM BC tower on a mountaintop
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00260.html (9,482 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:08:07 -0400
In my web surfing, I've come across one (or more) website(s) that apparently showed every non-Amateur licensee when you give it a zip code, plotted on a Google map. Not just the broadcast stations.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00262.html (8,111 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:29:06 -0400
A friend of mine (KJ4IEA) runs this site: http://www.rabbitears.info I also help him out with some development and other stuff. Basically that site has everything you wanted to know about US digital
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00263.html (8,279 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Ryan Jairam <rjairam@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:31:01 -0400
Hi Andy, You might be referring to http://www.cellreception.com/towers. I believe that site contains a listing of cellular and two way radio towers. 73 Ryan, N2RJ -- Ryan A. Jairam, _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00264.html (9,074 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: "Blake Bowers" <bbowers@mozarks.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 11:33:17 -0500
http://www.antennasearch.com/ This one is not perfect - but it is the best I have found. It still does not include many PCS and other licenses. Don't take your organs to heaven, heaven knows we need
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00265.html (9,043 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: <scottw3tx@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 12:58:20 -0400
My advice is to continue looking for a new QTH. The further away from any other source of RF, including plasma TV's, the better 73, Scott W3TX _______________________________________________ ________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00266.html (8,294 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: K7LXC@aol.com
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:10:30 EDT
degrees. I found such a site, but so did 6 or so commercial tower/transmitter operators before me. The towers range from 100 to 250', from guyed to freestanding, from VHF to microwave stuck all over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00267.html (10,548 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: "J.P." <jp@ezoom.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 10:21:56 -0700
I agree. This is not a location I'd be giving any serious thought to as an HF friendly location.  To invest the time and money you're talking about will give you a really crappy ROI here. W2XX/7 My a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00268.html (8,707 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:15:57 -0400
Heh - How RF rich are some of these sites? I saw one where the guy had a 2m band antenna, and he hooked up his bird watt meter to the antenna (and NOTHING else - no rig etc) - he was reading 5 WATTS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00269.html (8,614 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: jeff millar <jeff@wa1hco.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 18:57:27 -0400
I'm a bit more optimistic than some of the other based on years of experience on a similar but less extreme site. We operate VHF/UHF/Microwave contest from Mount Graylock in West Mass. That site has
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00277.html (12,213 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:04:16 -0700
Thanks to all who provided comments on this topic. They were all great and helpful. I've decided to pass on this QTH for the reasons advised and some cursory measurements I made with a mobile rig. He
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00288.html (11,301 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Mountain top multi tower QTH (score: 1)
Author: Andy <ai.egrps@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:52:11 -0400
Jeff, Were you aware that your ham license expired last month? _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00296.html (8,353 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu